![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Project Index | |||||||
| Code: SARF054 Title: Assessment of protocols aand development of best practice contingency guidance to improve stock containment at cage and land based sites Start Date: 01/04/2009 End Date: 01/10/2009 Main Contractor(s): Thistle Environmental Partnership Other Sponsor(s): N/A |
|
|
Objectives:
Objective 2: To identify the pros and cons of finfish protocols (industry and generic codes of practice, management systems, standards and regulation) in use in Scotland and worldwide in regard to their effectiveness in generating secure containment and preventing escapes. Objective 3: To identify the pros and cons of the operational practices of Scottish and selected Norwegian finfish farmers (and those from other countries within budgetary constraints) from the perspective of their effectiveness in regard to generating secure containment and preventing escapes. Objective 4: To assess whether there are existing or emerging aquaculture technologies and practices from Scotland and elsewhere in the world (e.g. the SSPO's 'demonstration project') which, if adopted in Scotland, may help reduce escapes. Objective 5: To briefly consider whether there may be existing or emerging technologies and practices from industries other than aquaculture which if adopted in Scotland may help reduce escapes. Objective
6: To briefly reflect the current status of research into biocontainment
from the perspective of its use as a practical measure for reducing the
impact of escapes in Scotland. |
|
|
Project Summary: The
approach is based on assessing how well existing protocols (Codes of Practice,
standards and operating practices) address the causes of finfish escape
incidents and hence represent a robust approach to containment, particularly
in light of the gradual move towards larger and more exposed sites in
Scotland. Breaches of containment are often caused by more than one factor
and generally the recording of escapes in Scotland to date has not included
the secondary causes or provided sufficient detail to allow the evaluation
of how effective existing and proposed containment measures (protocols
and technological) are in the prevention of escape incidents. This
project aims to build on the existing work that has been done in this
area both within Scotland and abroad. |